For the teacher working with older students
who lack foundation skills, this course should offer ideas for building
skills while addressing grade level content. This can be done
with even a few minutes dedicated to skill building each day. More
importantly, it can be done by focusing on fewer facts at a time and then using
or practicing them to automaticity.
I reference the NCTM (National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics) position paper on interventions. In this
document the organization stressed the need to invest time in hitting the “big
picture” concepts rather than relegating an older student to a lower level
curriculum. Later in the video conferences I will refer to aspects
of this as the “super powers of math.”
In a recent presentation I gave at a
university STEM conference, I outlined two type of intervention: the intensity
of a summer ‘boot camp” or what I call “infusion for inclusion.” In
a summer session, an interventionist can attempt to lay a foundation for math
processing by trying to address the core concepts in a hierarchy of math
concepts outlined as foundation skills. In an “infusion” model, an
instructor would attempt to direct targeted practice and focus on smaller
aspects of these same concepts but on a daily basis in warm ups, practice pages
or homework. Neither is ideal, but core concepts and foundation
skills must be addressed if students are to understand the math they are
currently studying.
First, you must determine if students have
a sense of numeracy. Are they still counting on fingers? Are they
unable to perform basic calculations without using a calculator? Do they
lack a sense of what operations mean? You will need to assess your
students to find what they know and don’t know.
In the first day of my summer math camps
for adolescents, we do not use pencil and paper. There are no worksheets,
no paper homework, no quizzes. Students begin by solving problems with
manipulatives. I use the craft sticks, base ten blocks, fraction manipulatives,
pattern blocks…anything that can model basic operations. I like to begin
with subtraction with regrouping using the craft sticks and a place value
mat. Sometimes, depending on the age of the students, I include
regrouping from the whole to the part so they would need to break the stick to
solve for a fractional amount. They may work independently or in
pairs. In every case, the students go home and say that this is not like
any math class they have attended. They like the nature of the hands on
work.
I usually quickly find that many students
do not understand what they have been doing on paper. They “borrow” and
“carry,” “flip and multiply,” create lattices or divide with partial
quotients, but they have poor understanding of what they are doing on
paper because it was taught only at the abstract level with few or no quantity
representations. Taking them back to the concrete level is enlightening
for many of them. It is also fun.
Once we establish these quantity
representations at the concrete and pictorial level, we can quickly make the
links to what they have been doing in the abstract. Some students will
progress in a matter of a day or so. Others will need more time.
The second key to reaching the students
beyond the concrete representations is using explicit language and
"friendly" or easy numbers. Whenever you teach something new,
make your language as precise as you can and use easily accessible numbers so
the students can focus on the meaning behind the math. If they must
struggle to retrieve number facts in the middle of some sequential algorithm,
you have lost them before you start. Using easy numbers for instruction
does not harm any student and it leaves the teacher the possibility of
differentiating and adding rigor for those students who need it. Using
“friendly” numbers for instruction and differentiated numbers for practice and
applications allows all boats to rise when the curriculum tide comes in.
Thus, one strategy is to present numbers
students will use but early in the lesson. The warm up is perfect.
Lead students to fill in PART of a times table chart rather than giving them
one already filled out. They create their own near point reference.
I like to use the seven times table and the perfect squares. Then USE those
numbers in class for all work that day and for several days so that the facts
become friendlier and friendlier. With the seven times table and the
perfect squares, you can teach multiplication, division, simplifying fractions,
mental math, the distributive property, multi-digit arithmetic and simplifying
radicals. Food for thought.
Finally, I will add that one common deficit
among older students is in numeracy- composition and decomposition patterns-
for the digits from six through nine. Early on, students are taught to
"count on" to add and to "count back" to subtract.
They are not given sufficient practice in these numeracy patterns and therefore
have great difficulty in addition and especially subtraction across a
ten. Provide small incremental practice with these patterns in warm-ups
or brief practice sets. Use no more than one or two patterns at a time
and use the patterns across place value. If you subtract for example
13-7, decompose the 7 as 3 and 4. Lead students to subtract 3 to get to
10 and then subtract the 4. Then use the same pattern to subtract 7 from
43, 63, 93 and then to subtract 17 from 83. Demonstrate math reasoning
but with the same pattern in different contexts. With some students you
could even take the pattern to 3-7=-4.
I have taught middle school students who I now realize lacked numeracy skills. I had one student who had a great memory and DID memorize many multiplication and division facts (and probably capitals of various counties :) ). On the other hand, she couldn't respond to simple word problems involving these concepts, and she could only add and subtract with counting. It is truly enlightening to see this student's issues as less of a mystery, and, instead, as an increasingly known pattern of moving on in the curriculum before fully internalizing basic numeracy skills.
ReplyDelete