I sometimes work
with schools for at risk students. These students come in all categories
imaginable but with one common denominator. Many of them are below grade
level in skills not only math, but reading, writing and critical
thinking. They are still required to pass state mandated tests and exit exams.
This includes algebra I. I have students who are not allowed to use
calculators on these tests and are still counting on fingers and ignoring all
word problems. They guess at random or simply put their heads down in
defeat.
I see teachers
trying to teach content for which the students are wholly unprepared. I
see them feeling frustrated because they feel they do not have time to teach
content deeply and must take short cuts. They throw their hands up and
teach procedures hoping they will stick for the week or so until the testing is
done. They practice random sample test prep questions, public release items
which cover a year's worth of content in random order, one problem isolated
from the next as if it all makes perfect sense.
In this type of
school there is frequently high turnover in both students and teachers.
There are often students who enter the week before the tests. Their
skills are a patchwork of misunderstood procedures and a lack of numeracy is
almost a given. The students push numbers around with no meaning.
Throughout the year
I refer to the What Works Clearinghouse suggestions and Universal Design for
Learning. I strongly suggest numeracy activities at all levels of
math. I mandate teaching some facts to mastery and using those facts for
all new introductions. We use linkages and emphasize practice in
sub-skills before embedding those subs-kills in larger a context.
I will give one
example I used recently. The object of the lesson was simplifying
radicals for an upcoming algebra 1 exit exam. I began with
multiplication. We constructed perfect squares using simple cubes to
demonstrate square numbers. We placed them on a multiplication chart to
illustrate the products growing diagonally down the page. I only
constructed the first few, to make the point of perfect squares and then
transitioned to the representational level. We inserted the meaning of
the square root and began choral recitation of the facts. Two squared is
four and the square root of four is two. Three squared is nine and the
square root of nine is three. We counted by perfect squares to one
hundred sixty nine and back by squares to one. We alternated using the
meaning of "squared" occasionally asking "what number times itself
is forty-nine?" They did not use calculators.
We discussed why
other radicals are irrational and how the most accurate way to write them was
with the radical. Finally I introduced the concept that the square root
could be simplified by factoring out a perfect square and "pulling out its
root." Within the hour these remedial students were factoring
radicals and simplifying them.
The process:
Begin with something they know, link it to something they can relate to
and learn quickly, use visual representations and manipulatives conceptually,
teach incrementally in logical steps using repetitive procedures that make
sense and relate to the final solution, teach the sub-skills and integrate them
into the final skill set, solidify learning with practice and problem solving.
Time: one class 50 minutes to one hour.
And at the end, the
students were leaving for the day. One rather tall young man hung back as
they exited and said,"I just wanted to thank you lady, for teaching me
that today. I got it. I got it really fast." Priceless.
Wow! Thanks for sharing that rewarding experience.
ReplyDeleteI am frustrated by how many students slip through the cracks. I have seen it too much. The system and parents try to push them through when they are not ready. I think that the CRA approach is essential for these students. We need to slow down and go back to the basics/foundational skills before these students are prepared to move forward.
ReplyDelete