One Added note:
The What Works Practice Guide for Problem Solving was updated as of October of
2018. It advocates just this approach.
“You are not
Michelangelo and this is not the Sistine Chapel,” I said to a student one
day. He was following his inclination to put more effort into his drawing
than into the math reasoning behind it. He had to draw yet another of
those pencil boxes or pouches for a quantity of pencils for a word
problem. I explained the reference and then we discussed the way that
pictures can be a way for us to solve problems visually in math, or at least to
help us support our reasoning.
In math today we are
encouraging young learners to use multiple representations to solve problems in
math. First, it encourages use of multiple regions of the bran to unify
thinking across sensory areas. The more troops you bring to the building,
the faster the building will go up. Students can sometimes get bogged down in
the art and invest more in the fringe to the pencil pouches than into the
numbers of pencils in the group.
Like the use of
manipulatives, the teacher needs to streamline the learning for maximum
effect. We need to encourage efficiency, focus and directed effort.
The goal is the get the child to fluent calculations at the abstract level but
those which are supported by sound mathematical thinking. Visualization
of a problem can absolutely support that “reasoning and sense making” as the
NCTM calls it. But we as teachers may need to provide guided practice in
the efficient drawing of shapes to solve problems.
I recall an instance
of solving division with an elementary school class. They were dividing
42 by 6. It is true that one might begin in division with the
dividend and draw 42 objects and begin the division from there. However,
for efficiency’s sake we could also reason that in this case the story problem
was asking for groups of 6. Beginning with the smaller number and making
patterns of six, in this case either tally marks + 1 or the dice pattern of
six, made absolute sense.
We were working in
groups, some students with me and some with the classroom teacher. Her
small group began by drawing 42 straight lines. My group began by
reasoning out the problem, deciding on groups of 6 and discussing the best …ie,
most efficient method of drawing that solution. The teacher’s group arrived at
a solution with remainders. Not a single child achieved an accurate
answer independently. The children in my group all working in pairs,
achieved an accurate response.
How could this
happen? Deficits in attention to detail, fine motor issues, impassivity,
and awkward handwriting grip all created problems for her group. The
lines were drawn too haphazardly, close together and at random widths apart
that circling groups of 6 was impossible to do with accuracy. The
children could not assess the accuracy of their solutions with clear
results. In addition, we could recall the research on numeracy and invest
in making groups of quantities we could recognize by pattern…groupings of
smaller quantities which are visually recognizable. Remember the 9 rhombi
in your first power point presentation? The domino pattern of 9 was
instantly recognizable whereas anything over 4 items in a line or not in a
pattern must be counted.
The lesson here is
that children need explicit instruction in efficient diagram drawing methods:
dots, tally marks, sets of dots within a circle, boxes, x’s, squiggles…anything
that is relatively easy and efficient to draw and group. This is true
even at the middle and high school level when calculating surface area.
It helps to draw the shapes for which one must calculate area and determine how
many of them are a part of the shape.
Venn diagrams are
easy for illustrating the two meanings of division. I created an
elaborate one for my professional development seminars but simple dots and circle
work especially well with students. In any case, we need to encourage,
supervise and praise students as they think mathematically, reason through
story problems and represent their thinking in a multitude of ways. This
includes efficient drawing to support their reasoning.
Here is an example of
a child's work for solving a multiplication with fractions problem. Note
the wording: Five "groups" of the quantity 3/4. The
problem would look differently if it were 3/4 of five. Note that in this representation
he can see the total number of fourths as well as the mixed number
result.
And another based on
his work with fraction division. In my field we say that one never gives
up teaching private students because they teach us as much as we teach them.
One final
representation, allows student to define terms with pictures. Think:
Visual Dictionary. In this file, teachers can create a student worksheet,
warm up activity, and exam study sheet all in one file.
I find this to definitely be an issue with my Firsties - either drawings are jumbled and illegible or waaaayy too detailed. I think I had been proposing my simplified style as more of an option, but not this time! I will definitely give explicit instruction on what I expect for mathematical drawing this year and have them save the rainbow hearts and detailed doodles for free math play time.
ReplyDeleteI had not put time into giving explicit instruction in efficient math drawings. I can see how this would be very helpful!
DeleteModeling math concepts is a huge part of what I do with my students, but often, the students who will benefit from using this strategy the most are the students who struggle with fine motor control or spatial awareness. I plan to spend more time with them this year teaching them efficient ways to represent their thinking. As I differentiate for my students, I may need to provide some of them with templates or frameworks for their models to help make the modeling process more accessible for all of them.
ReplyDelete